Posted By : Mark Vena | Posted in :
Features |
As I sat at my computer browsing the Internet for an article worth writing about, I began to think about writing itself. Isn’t writing about formulating a coherent and cohesive thought and then writing about it in a proper format? Growing up and attending school I was taught to properly use the English language whether it was spoken or written, but a new form of English has emerged that has decimated an otherwise perfectly good language.
Text Messaging has become a new form of communicating what an individual wants to say in a shorter form. Texting is a language of its own created as the need for shorter ways of saying simple phrases arose. A simple word such as, “ok” or a phrase like, “see you later” has been replaced with letters and numbers that would make an English professor cringe at the very sight of this language.
Fifteen years ago two men by the name of Neil Papworth and Richard Jarvis sent and received the very first text message, respectively. Fast-forward fifteen years and that one text message has multiplied to nearly one billion messages being sent every week - an increase by 25 percent over last year.
It’s from this need that the disintegration of the English language has developed. The use of this language as stated above has created a new shortened form of writing, but at what cost? The average teenager knows how to text and read the language as if by second nature. It becomes so second nature, that this jargon eventually ends up in the student’s formal writing. Articles have been written showing that the more a student is saturated with this language, the more apt she is to bring this form into the classroom.
So what’s the problem with texting? Students who learn how to use this language grow accustomed to reading it and eventually see past it, thus allowing the student to forgo the proper forms of punctuation, capitalization, spelling and many other proper grammatical nuances. The idea is that not only students, but grown adults are not distinguishing between proper English and texting language. In formal writing there is no place for texting lingo.
Basically, texting is a shortened form of the English language that has crept its way into standard writing. Gone is the time where students are taught how to properly write and its enforced everywhere they go. But instead of enforcement, these kids and adults alike are becoming more lackadaisical and its irritating when I receive a text message and I have to think about what these letters might mean. How hard is it to just type a simple sentence such as “I’ll see you later” instead of saying “c u l8er”? The answer is quite simple - It’s not hard.
Google unveiled today its new web app designed for the mobile browsing experience. Or, should I say, towards the iPhone browsing experience. The new web app recognizes the iPhone and Safari browser and automatically loads the new application. Instead of the normal Google web page, this app presents to users quick links to Google search, Gmail, Reader, Calendar and other services.
To coincide with the release of the new Google app, Google released a statement once again stating its goal of providing users with access to information wherever they may be, as part of its commitment towards mobile technologies.
Articles have been written in the past about the possibilities of Google outsmarting everyone, but it isn’t about outsmarting the industry, it’s about playing it smart.
With Google officially announcing its bid on the 700MHz spectrum, it may be inevitable that Google will become a force in the mobile market. The 700MHz spectrum has the ability to penetrate walls and extend over larger areas due to its lower frequency. This ability creates an available infrastructure capable of providing a nationwide Wi-Fi network.
With the possibility of acquiring this spectrum, Google may be able to push the envelope and begin to force its way into the mobile industry, much to the dismay of mobile behemoths Verizon and AT&T. Look at what Google has done recently: Android is growing as more companies and developers sign on with Google and begin developing apps for mobile devices with its free open source SDK. Android is becoming a platform that will extend Google’s reach far beyond the internet and well into the realm of the mobile market.
This may be a few years in the making, but think about this the next time you hear a development in the Google mobile story - Apple is rumored to be released from its contract in five years from AT&T and that might not just be a coincidence. Its entirely possible Steve Jobs and Google CEO Eric Schmidt are exploring a mobile relationship; a relationship that very well could push the boundaries of mobile devices and propel Apple and Google to the forefront of the mobile market.
Posted By : Mark Vena | Posted in :
Keyboards |
Researchers at Dreamlab Technologies AG and Remote-exploit.org have found a way to eavesdrop, decrypt and log keyboard strokes when transmitted on a 27MHz spectrum. The researchers validated their results using Microsoft’s Wireless Optical Desktop 1000 and 2000 and they have projected these results to affect the Wireless Optical Desktop 3000 and 4000, although neither were tested.
In order for a wireless keyboard to function, a receiver must be setup on a computer and an association process must occur. This process, also known as “connecting” or “synching”, usually happens with the push of a button on both the keyboard and the receiving component. Once this connection is established, the receiver stores the connection to memory and only recognizes that one particular keyboard and will reject any other requests from other wireless keyboards.
Originally, wireless keyboards used an infrared signal to establish a connection, but now companies have switched over to a radio frequency-based keyboard operating at 27MHz. The data being sent over this frequency is encrypted using a one byte USB HID keystroke. This data, once sent, is decoded by the receiver. But metakeys such as “CTRL”, “ALT”, and “Shift” are not encrypted.
This encryption uses a simple XOR mechanism which leaves a possibility of only 256 different values per keystroke packet received. This XOR mechanism results in a value of “true” if and only if the encrypted data sent has the same value. It is a simplistic code that can be broken using bruteforce to obtain the correct code.
The researchers at Dreamlabs and Remote-exploit.org realized that by using a simple wordlist checking together with a weightening algorithm, they could decode all data in range within a few keystrokes. They even go so far as to say that with even the slowest of computers today, this encryption can be broken.
This simple hacking done by Dreamlabs shows how easy it can be for a keylogging to affect even wireless systems. As such, one of the simplest way to thwart such a security risk would be to have a wired keyboard. But even then you are not safe as trojans and viruses can attack the computer and log your wired keyboard activity, then transmit the information back to the attacker. It is an easy way to obtain passwords, usernames and to bypass certain security measures put in place to protect a network or private computer.
AT&T has announced a 3G model of the Apple iPhone is due out in 2008. This comes as expected, considering Steve Jobs had already announced a 3G iPhone model. So to put it bluntly, AT&T is not surprising anyone. Yet, what does a 3G model bring to the user of the iPhone? And what does it do for customers who purchased an iPhone already? Simply put, nothing.
As an owner of the iPhone, I marvel at how well designed the phone truly is. Everything has been designed to just work, with no true problems associated. The only problem that I have found with the iPhone is the network. AT&T’s EDGE network is just plain slow as compared with the EVDO network provided by Verizon.
A 3G iPhone would deliver a new experience to iPhone users as they would be able use the functionality of the iPhone in a much faster environment. Using the iPhone when not connected to a wireless network is just plain brutal when using Safari or any other application that requires network connectivity.
For the majority of iPhone owners, the aforementioned problem doesn’t dissuade them from enjoying such a good product. Customers did not switch to AT&T for the network, they switched for a product that appealed to them. But when AT&T begins to sell the 3G iPhone, it will irritate many of its existing customers. Why would Apple sell the most anticipated cell phone to come to this industry in many years on such a slow network when it knew all to well it was going to have a 3G model?
The reason Steve Jobs has given is the lack of battery life. As research and technology have advanced, Apple has been able to lengthen the battery life of a 3G model. But this does not help the already existing customers who have the EDGE iPhone.
The question of does this change truly matter is a question easily answered: no. But this change certainly will broaden AT&T’s customer base. More cell phone users would be willing to change providers because the speed they need on a network will be provided along with a phone they desire.